Camden Property Trust vs Gaming and Leisure Properties
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Camden Property Trust and Gaming and Leisure Properties side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Gaming and Leisure Properties is the larger business, with $1.6B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $1.6B for Camden Property Trust.
- Gaming and Leisure Properties grew revenue faster (4.1%, against 1.9%).
- Gaming and Leisure Properties turned more of its sales into free cash flow (51.7% FCF margin, against 24.5%).
- Gaming and Leisure Properties earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (10.2%, against 6.3%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Camden Property Trust’s earnings: a P/E of 33.8x against 11.6x for Gaming and Leisure Properties.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 8 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Camden Property Trust
CPT
3/8
5-year growthNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Gaming and Leisure Properties
GLPI
5/8
Revenue growthNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equity
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | CPT FY25 | GLPI FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $10.4B | $11.3B |
| Revenue | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| Free cash flow | $386M | $825M |
| Net income | $385M | $825M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 1.9% | 4.1% |
| 5-year growth | 8.6% | 6.7% |
| Share count change | −0.1% | 2.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 64.0% | — |
| Operating margin | — | 75.3% |
| Net margin | 24.4% | 51.7% |
| FCF margin | 24.5% | 51.7% |
| Return on capital | 6.3% | 10.2% |
| Return on equity | 8.5% | 18.6% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $3.9B | $7.0B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.4x | 4.7x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $732M | $872M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 33.8x | 11.6x |
| Piotroski F-score | — | — |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

