Everest Group vs MGIC Investment
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRAβs take AI analyst
I put Everest Group and MGIC Investment side by side, using each oneβs latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Everest Group is the larger business, with $17.5B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $1.2B for MGIC Investment, about 14 times as much.
- Everest Group grew revenue faster (1.2%, against 0.5%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of MGIC Investmentβs earnings: a P/E of 9.0x against 8.4x for Everest Group.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 5 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Everest Group
EG
2/5
Revenue growth5-year growth
MGIC Investment
MTG
3/5
Net marginReturn on equityShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | EG FY25 | MTG FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $15.4B | $6.1B |
| Revenue | $17.5B | $1.2B |
| Free cash flow | β | $852M |
| Net income | $1.6B | $738M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 1.2% | 0.5% |
| 5-year growth | 12.8% | 0.2% |
| Share count change | β2.6% | β11.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | β | β |
| Operating margin | β | β |
| Net margin | 9.1% | 60.8% |
| FCF margin | β | 70.2% |
| Return on capital | β | β |
| Return on equity | 10.9% | 14.3% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | β | β |
| Net debt / EBITDA | β | β |
| Dividends and buybacks | $1.1B | $921M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 8.4x | 9.0x |
| Piotroski F-score | β | β |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.