G-III Apparel Group vs Warby Parker
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRAβs take AI analyst
I put G-III Apparel Group and Warby Parker side by side, using each oneβs latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- G-III Apparel Group is the larger business, with $3.0B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $872M for Warby Parker, about 3.4 times as much.
- Warby Parker grew revenue faster (13.0%, against β7.0%).
- G-III Apparel Group kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (3.7% operating margin, against β0.6%).
- G-III Apparel Group turned more of its sales into free cash flow (8.9% FCF margin, against 5.0%).
- G-III Apparel Group earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (4.6%, against β3.4%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
G-III Apparel Group
GIII
7/11
Operating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreShare count change
Warby Parker
WRBY
4/11
Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginNet debt / EBITDA
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | GIII FY25 | WRBY FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $1.3B | $3.2B |
| Revenue | $3.0B | $872M |
| Free cash flow | $264M | $43.7M |
| Net income | $67.4M | $1.6M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | β7.0% | 13.0% |
| 5-year growth | 7.6% | 17.2% |
| Share count change | β3.5% | 3.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.4% | 54.0% |
| Operating margin | 3.7% | β0.6% |
| Net margin | 2.3% | 0.2% |
| FCF margin | 8.9% | 5.0% |
| Return on capital | 4.6% | β3.4% |
| Return on equity | 3.9% | 0.5% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | β$402M | β$286M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | β2.9x | β6.4x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $54.0M | $0.0M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 9.6x | β |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 4 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.