Huntington Ingalls Industries vs TransDigm Group
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Huntington Ingalls Industries and TransDigm Group side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Huntington Ingalls Industries is the larger business, with $12.5B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $8.8B for TransDigm Group.
- TransDigm Group grew revenue faster (11.2%, against 8.2%).
- TransDigm Group kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (47.2% operating margin, against 5.3%).
- TransDigm Group turned more of its sales into free cash flow (20.6% FCF margin, against 6.4%).
- TransDigm Group earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (22.5%, against 7.3%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of TransDigm Group’s earnings: a P/E of 34.3x against 16.8x for Huntington Ingalls Industries.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Huntington Ingalls Industries
HII
3/9
Piotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
TransDigm Group
TDG
6/9
Revenue growth5-year growthOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capital
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | HII FY25 | TDG FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $11.1B | $64.9B |
| Revenue | $12.5B | $8.8B |
| Free cash flow | $794M | $1.8B |
| Net income | $605M | $2.1B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 8.2% | 11.2% |
| 5-year growth | 5.9% | 11.6% |
| Share count change | −0.3% | 0.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | 60.1% |
| Operating margin | 5.3% | 47.2% |
| Net margin | 4.9% | 23.5% |
| FCF margin | 6.4% | 20.6% |
| Return on capital | 7.3% | 22.5% |
| Return on equity | 12.4% | — |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $1.9B | $26.8B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.0x | 5.9x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $213M | $659M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 16.8x | 34.3x |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 4 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.