Helmerich & Payne vs Noble
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Helmerich & Payne and Noble side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Helmerich & Payne is the larger business, with $3.7B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.3B for Noble.
- Helmerich & Payne grew revenue faster (35.9%, against 7.5%).
- Noble kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (12.7% operating margin, against 0.1%).
- Noble turned more of its sales into free cash flow (13.2% FCF margin, against 3.1%).
- Noble earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (5.3%, against 0.1%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 8 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Helmerich & Payne
HP
2/8
Revenue growthShare count change
Noble
NE
6/8
Operating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-score
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | HP FY25 | NE FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $3.9B | $7.6B |
| Revenue | $3.7B | $3.3B |
| Free cash flow | $117M | $432M |
| Net income | −$164M | $217M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 35.9% | 7.5% |
| 5-year growth | 16.1% | — |
| Share count change | 0.2% | 5.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | 12.7% |
| Net margin | −4.4% | 6.6% |
| FCF margin | 3.1% | 13.2% |
| Return on capital | 0.1% | 5.3% |
| Return on equity | −5.7% | 4.7% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $1.8B | $1.6B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.9x | — |
| Dividends and buybacks | $101M | $340M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | 50.7x |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

