Magnolia Oil & Gas vs Texas Pacific Land
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Magnolia Oil & Gas and Texas Pacific Land side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Magnolia Oil & Gas is the larger business, with $1.3B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $798M for Texas Pacific Land, about 1.6 times as much.
- Texas Pacific Land grew revenue faster (13.1%, against −0.3%).
- Texas Pacific Land kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (74.2% operating margin, against 33.5%).
- Texas Pacific Land earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (45.0%, against 16.8%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Magnolia Oil & Gas
MGY
2/9
Piotroski F-scoreShare count change
Texas Pacific Land
TPL
7/9
Revenue growth5-year growthOperating marginNet marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityNet debt / EBITDA
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | MGY FY25 | TPL FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $4.8B | $23.3B |
| Revenue | $1.3B | $798M |
| Free cash flow | — | — |
| Net income | $325M | $481M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | −0.3% | 13.1% |
| 5-year growth | 19.4% | 21.4% |
| Share count change | −0.5% | −0.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Operating margin | 33.5% | 74.2% |
| Net margin | 24.8% | 60.3% |
| FCF margin | — | — |
| Return on capital | 16.8% | 45.0% |
| Return on equity | 16.4% | 37.2% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $127M | −$145M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.1x | −0.2x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $113M | $156M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | 43.1x |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

