Phillips 66 vs World Kinect
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRAβs take AI analyst
I put Phillips 66 and World Kinect side by side, using each oneβs latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Phillips 66 is the larger business, with $132.4B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $36.9B for World Kinect, about 3.6 times as much.
- Phillips 66 grew revenue faster (β7.5%, against β12.5%).
- Phillips 66 earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (11.2%, against β20.9%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 8 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Phillips 66
PSX
7/8
Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginNet marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-score
World Kinect
WKC
1/8
Share count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | PSX FY25 | WKC FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $116.3B | $1.9B |
| Revenue | $132.4B | $36.9B |
| Free cash flow | β | $227M |
| Net income | $4.4B | β$614M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | β7.5% | β12.5% |
| 5-year growth | 15.6% | 12.6% |
| Share count change | β3.3% | β6.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 12.3% | 2.6% |
| Operating margin | β | β1.5% |
| Net margin | 3.3% | β1.7% |
| FCF margin | β | 0.6% |
| Return on capital | 11.2% | β20.9% |
| Return on equity | 15.6% | β37.8% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $18.6B | $504M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.9x | β |
| Dividends and buybacks | $3.1B | $126M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 16.5x | β |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.