Skip to content
stoqly
en · USD

Appearance

Language

Currency

Popular

All currencies

Data is in US dollars, converted at the ECB reference rate of Oct 26, 2026.

Sign in

Applied Materials vs Arrow Electronics

Add, change or remove companies; up to four.

KIRA’s take AI analyst

I put Applied Materials and Arrow Electronics side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:

Who comes out ahead

Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.

Applied Materials

AMAT

10/11

5-year growthGross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change

Arrow Electronics

ARW

1/11

Revenue growth

Side by side

Best in the row

Latest fiscal year AMAT FY25 ARW FY25
Size
Market cap $310.1B $11.1B
Revenue $28.4B $30.9B
Free cash flow $5.7B −$37.2M
Net income $7.0B $571M
Growth
Revenue growth 4.4% 10.5%
5-year growth 10.5% 1.5%
Share count change −3.1% −2.9%
Profitability
Gross margin 48.7% 11.2%
Operating margin 29.2% 2.7%
Net margin 24.7% 1.9%
FCF margin 20.1% −0.1%
Return on capital 35.9% 7.3%
Return on equity 35.5% 9.3%
Balance sheet
Net debt −$2.0B $2.8B
Net debt / EBITDA −0.2x 2.9x
Dividends and buybacks $6.3B $162M
Valuation & quality
P/E 33.4x 13.7x
Piotroski F-score 7 6

Ten years

Revenue

AMAT ARW

Operating margin

AMAT ARW

Free cash flow

AMAT ARW

Return on capital

AMAT ARW

Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

↑ ↓ to move · ↵ to open