Centene vs Humana
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Centene and Humana side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Centene is the larger business, with $194.8B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $129.7B for Humana, about 1.5 times as much.
- Centene grew revenue faster (19.4%, against 10.1%).
- Humana kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (2.1% operating margin, against −3.9%).
- Centene turned more of its sales into free cash flow (2.2% FCF margin, against 0.3%).
- Humana earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (25.7%, against −26.4%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Centene
CNC
4/9
Revenue growth5-year growthFCF marginShare count change
Humana
HUM
4/9
Operating marginNet marginReturn on capitalReturn on equity
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | CNC FY25 | HUM FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $33.9B | $50.4B |
| Revenue | $194.8B | $129.7B |
| Free cash flow | $4.3B | $375M |
| Net income | −$6.7B | $1.2B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 19.4% | 10.1% |
| 5-year growth | 11.9% | 10.9% |
| Share count change | −5.9% | −0.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Operating margin | −3.9% | 2.1% |
| Net margin | −3.4% | 0.9% |
| FCF margin | 2.2% | 0.3% |
| Return on capital | −26.4% | 25.7% |
| Return on equity | −28.8% | 7.0% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | −$2.8B | −$7.5B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | — | −2.2x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $475M | $581M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | 44.5x |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

