Greif vs O-I Glass
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Greif and O-I Glass side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- O-I Glass is the larger business, with $6.4B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.9B for Greif, about 1.6 times as much.
- O-I Glass grew revenue faster (−1.6%, against −9.7%).
- O-I Glass turned more of its sales into free cash flow (2.6% FCF margin, against −2.2%).
- O-I Glass earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (4.2%, against 1.9%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 8 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Greif
GEF
4/8
Gross marginNet marginReturn on equityNet debt / EBITDA
O-I Glass
OI
4/8
Revenue growth5-year growthFCF marginReturn on capital
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | GEF FY25 | OI FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | — | $989M |
| Revenue | $3.9B | $6.4B |
| Free cash flow | −$85.2M | $168M |
| Net income | $840M | −$129M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | −9.7% | −1.6% |
| 5-year growth | −2.7% | 1.1% |
| Share count change | — | −0.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.2% | 17.3% |
| Operating margin | 4.3% | — |
| Net margin | 21.4% | −2.0% |
| FCF margin | −2.2% | 2.6% |
| Return on capital | 1.9% | 4.2% |
| Return on equity | 33.6% | −10.9% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $985M | $4.2B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.4x | 5.5x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $101M | $40.0M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | — |
| Piotroski F-score | — | 6 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.