Graham vs Laureate Education
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Graham and Laureate Education side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Graham is the larger business, with $4.9B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $1.7B for Laureate Education, about 2.9 times as much.
- Laureate Education grew revenue faster (8.6%, against 2.5%).
- Laureate Education kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (25.3% operating margin, against 4.8%).
- Laureate Education turned more of its sales into free cash flow (15.5% FCF margin, against 5.6%).
- Laureate Education earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (28.6%, against 3.1%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Graham
GHC
1/10
5-year growth
Laureate Education
LAUR
9/10
Revenue growthOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | GHC FY25 | LAUR FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $5.3B | $5.5B |
| Revenue | $4.9B | $1.7B |
| Free cash flow | $275M | $263M |
| Net income | $292M | $282M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 2.5% | 8.6% |
| 5-year growth | 11.2% | 10.7% |
| Share count change | −0.7% | −3.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | 28.3% |
| Operating margin | 4.8% | 25.3% |
| Net margin | 6.0% | 16.6% |
| FCF margin | 5.6% | 15.5% |
| Return on capital | 3.1% | 28.6% |
| Return on equity | 6.5% | 26.2% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $638M | −$19.0M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.8x | −0.0x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $34.9M | $215M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | 17.7x |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.