Matador Resources vs Range Resources
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRAβs take AI analyst
I put Matador Resources and Range Resources side by side, using each oneβs latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Matador Resources is the larger business, with $3.7B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.1B for Range Resources.
- Range Resources grew revenue faster (28.9%, against 5.5%).
- Range Resources turned more of its sales into free cash flow (18.9% FCF margin, against 7.3%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Range Resourcesβs earnings: a P/E of 15.6x against 10.2x for Matador Resources.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 6 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Matador Resources
MTDR
1/6
5-year growth
Range Resources
RRC
5/6
Revenue growthNet marginFCF marginReturn on equityShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | MTDR FY25 | RRC FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $7.4B | $13.3B |
| Revenue | $3.7B | $3.1B |
| Free cash flow | $270M | $590M |
| Net income | $759M | $658M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 5.5% | 28.9% |
| 5-year growth | 33.8% | 9.6% |
| Share count change | 0.4% | β1.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | β | β |
| Operating margin | 33.2% | β |
| Net margin | 20.5% | 21.1% |
| FCF margin | 7.3% | 18.9% |
| Return on capital | β | 13.7% |
| Return on equity | 14.1% | 15.9% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | β | $1.2B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | β | 0.9x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $219M | $85.7M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 10.2x | 15.6x |
| Piotroski F-score | β | 8 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.