AptarGroup vs Silgan
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put AptarGroup and Silgan side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Silgan is the larger business, with $6.5B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.8B for AptarGroup, about 1.7 times as much.
- Silgan grew revenue faster (10.7%, against 5.4%).
- AptarGroup turned more of its sales into free cash flow (7.9% FCF margin, against 6.5%).
- AptarGroup earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (11.4%, against 7.6%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of AptarGroup’s earnings: a P/E of 22.9x against 15.2x for Silgan.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
AptarGroup
ATR
6/9
Net marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Silgan
SLGN
2/9
Revenue growth5-year growth
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | ATR FY25 | SLGN FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $8.2B | $4.1B |
| Revenue | $3.8B | $6.5B |
| Free cash flow | $300M | $423M |
| Net income | $393M | $288M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 5.4% | 10.7% |
| 5-year growth | 5.2% | 5.7% |
| Share count change | −1.4% | −0.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | 17.7% |
| Operating margin | 13.3% | — |
| Net margin | 10.4% | 4.5% |
| FCF margin | 7.9% | 6.5% |
| Return on capital | 11.4% | 7.6% |
| Return on equity | 15.3% | 13.5% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $1.1B | $3.3B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.4x | 3.6x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $486M | $161M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 22.9x | 15.2x |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.