Dynatrace vs Pegasystems
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRAβs take AI analyst
I put Dynatrace and Pegasystems side by side, using each oneβs latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Dynatrace is the larger business, with $2.0B of revenue in fiscal 2026 against $1.7B for Pegasystems.
- Dynatrace grew revenue faster (18.8%, against 16.6%).
- Pegasystems kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (15.1% operating margin, against 12.2%).
- Pegasystems turned more of its sales into free cash flow (28.1% FCF margin, against 26.2%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Dynatraceβs earnings: a P/E of 128.4x against 22.6x for Pegasystems.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Dynatrace
DT
4/9
Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginShare count change
Pegasystems
PEGA
5/9
Operating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on equityPiotroski F-score
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | DT FY26 | PEGA FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $18.8B | $6.1B |
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.7B |
| Free cash flow | $530M | $491M |
| Net income | $163M | $393M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 18.8% | 16.6% |
| 5-year growth | 23.5% | 11.4% |
| Share count change | 0.0% | 3.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 81.6% | 75.9% |
| Operating margin | 12.2% | 15.1% |
| Net margin | 8.1% | 22.5% |
| FCF margin | 26.2% | 28.1% |
| Return on capital | 9.0% | β |
| Return on equity | 6.2% | 57.3% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | β$1.2B | β$426M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | β | β1.5x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $479M | $515M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 128.4x | 22.6x |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

