Chesapeake Utilities vs National Fuel Gas
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Chesapeake Utilities and National Fuel Gas side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- National Fuel Gas is the larger business, with $2.3B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $930M for Chesapeake Utilities, about 2.4 times as much.
- Chesapeake Utilities grew revenue faster (18.1%, against 17.1%).
- National Fuel Gas kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (35.7% operating margin, against 27.5%).
- National Fuel Gas turned more of its sales into free cash flow (8.2% FCF margin, against −23.1%).
- National Fuel Gas earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (10.6%, against 6.1%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Chesapeake Utilities
CPK
2/10
Revenue growth5-year growth
National Fuel Gas
NFG
8/10
Operating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | CPK FY25 | NFG FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $3.2B | $7.8B |
| Revenue | $930M | $2.3B |
| Free cash flow | −$215M | $187M |
| Net income | $140M | $519M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 18.1% | 17.1% |
| 5-year growth | 13.8% | 8.1% |
| Share count change | 4.3% | −1.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Operating margin | 27.5% | 35.7% |
| Net margin | 15.1% | 22.8% |
| FCF margin | −23.1% | 8.2% |
| Return on capital | 6.1% | 10.6% |
| Return on equity | 9.4% | 33.7% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $1.7B | $2.8B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.8x | 2.2x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $60.7M | $243M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | 11.4x |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.