Tapestry vs Williams-Sonoma
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Tapestry and Williams-Sonoma side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Tapestry is the larger business, with $8.0B of revenue in fiscal 2026 against $7.8B for Williams-Sonoma.
- Tapestry grew revenue faster (14.2%, against 1.2%).
- Tapestry kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (23.9% operating margin, against 18.1%).
- Tapestry turned more of its sales into free cash flow (22.6% FCF margin, against 13.5%).
- Williams-Sonoma earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (106.5%, against 77.9%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Tapestry
TPR
9/11
Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreShare count change
Williams-Sonoma
WSM
2/11
Return on capitalNet debt / EBITDA
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | TPR FY26 | WSM FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $23.3B | $29.7B |
| Revenue | $8.0B | $7.8B |
| Free cash flow | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Net income | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 14.2% | 1.2% |
| 5-year growth | 6.9% | 2.9% |
| Share count change | −5.5% | −3.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 77.8% | 46.2% |
| Operating margin | 23.9% | 18.1% |
| Net margin | 19.1% | 13.9% |
| FCF margin | 22.6% | 13.5% |
| Return on capital | 77.9% | 106.5% |
| Return on equity | 197.1% | 51.5% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $1.2B | −$1.0B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.6x | −0.6x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $1.9B | $1.2B |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | 25.6x |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.