Albemarle vs Solstice Advanced Materials
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Albemarle and Solstice Advanced Materials side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Albemarle is the larger business, with $5.1B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.9B for Solstice Advanced Materials.
- Solstice Advanced Materials grew revenue faster (3.1%, against −4.4%).
- Albemarle turned more of its sales into free cash flow (13.5% FCF margin, against 3.1%).
- Solstice Advanced Materials earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (12.2%, against −2.4%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 8 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Albemarle
ALB
1/8
FCF margin
Solstice Advanced Materials
SOLS
6/8
Revenue growthGross marginNet marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityNet debt / EBITDA
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | ALB FY25 | SOLS FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $12.8B | $9.5B |
| Revenue | $5.1B | $3.9B |
| Free cash flow | $692M | $119M |
| Net income | −$511M | $237M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | −4.4% | 3.1% |
| 5-year growth | 10.5% | — |
| Share count change | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 13.0% | 32.2% |
| Operating margin | −7.1% | — |
| Net margin | −9.9% | 6.1% |
| FCF margin | 13.5% | 3.1% |
| Return on capital | −2.4% | 12.2% |
| Return on equity | −5.2% | 10.2% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $1.7B | $1.6B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.8x | 2.3x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $191M | $1.5B |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | — |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | — |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.