Skip to content
stoqly
en

Languages

Figures come from SEC filings, which are in English. Company and industry names stay as filed.

$ USD

Popular

All currencies

Data is in US dollars, converted at the ECB reference rate of Oct 26, 2026.

Archer Daniels Midland vs Bunge Global

Add, change or remove companies; up to four.

KIRA’s take AI analyst

I put Archer Daniels Midland and Bunge Global side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:

Who comes out ahead

Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.

Archer Daniels Midland

ADM

6/10

Gross marginNet marginFCF marginPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change

Bunge Global

BG

4/10

Revenue growth5-year growthReturn on capitalReturn on equity

Side by side

Best in the row

Latest fiscal year ADM FY25 BG FY25
Size
Market cap $38.9B $20.2B
Revenue $80.3B $70.3B
Free cash flow $4.2B −$879M
Net income $1.1B $816M
Growth
Revenue growth −6.2% 32.4%
5-year growth 4.5% 11.2%
Share count change −1.8% 17.1%
Profitability
Gross margin 6.3% 4.9%
Operating margin — —
Net margin 1.3% 1.2%
FCF margin 5.2% −1.3%
Return on capital 5.2% 6.1%
Return on equity 4.8% 6.3%
Balance sheet
Net debt $7.4B $12.2B
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 5.0x
Dividends and buybacks $987M $1.0B
Valuation & quality
P/E 22.0x 24.1x
Piotroski F-score 5 4

Ten years

Revenue

ADM BG

Operating margin

ADM BG

Free cash flow

ADM BG

Return on capital

ADM BG

Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

↑ ↓ to move · ↵ to open