Ashland Global vs Koppers
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Ashland Global and Koppers side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Koppers is the larger business, with $1.9B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $1.8B for Ashland Global.
- Koppers grew revenue faster (−10.2%, against −13.7%).
- Koppers kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (8.9% operating margin, against −42.5%).
- Koppers turned more of its sales into free cash flow (3.6% FCF margin, against 2.0%).
- Koppers earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (8.1%, against −17.5%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Ashland Global
ASH
2/10
Gross marginShare count change
Koppers
KOP
8/10
Revenue growth5-year growthOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-score
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | ASH FY25 | KOP FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $761M |
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.9B |
| Free cash flow | $36.0M | $67.5M |
| Net income | −$845M | $56.0M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | −13.7% | −10.2% |
| 5-year growth | −2.0% | 2.4% |
| Share count change | −8.0% | −4.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.1% | 23.8% |
| Operating margin | −42.5% | 8.9% |
| Net margin | −46.3% | 3.0% |
| FCF margin | 2.0% | 3.6% |
| Return on capital | −17.5% | 8.1% |
| Return on equity | −35.4% | 10.5% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $1.2B | $890M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | — | 3.7x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $176M | $44.6M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 68.9x | — |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

