Camden Property Trust vs Vivmark Residential
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Camden Property Trust and Vivmark Residential side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Vivmark Residential is the larger business, with $3.1B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $1.6B for Camden Property Trust, about 2.0 times as much.
- Vivmark Residential grew revenue faster (3.8%, against 1.9%).
- Vivmark Residential earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (7.6%, against 6.3%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Camden Property Trust’s earnings: a P/E of 33.8x against 27.2x for Vivmark Residential.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 7 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Camden Property Trust
CPT
2/7
5-year growthShare count change
Vivmark Residential
VMRK
5/7
Revenue growthNet marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityNet debt / EBITDA
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | CPT FY25 | VMRK FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $10.4B | $24.1B |
| Revenue | $1.6B | $3.1B |
| Free cash flow | $386M | — |
| Net income | $385M | $1.1B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 1.9% | 3.8% |
| 5-year growth | 8.6% | 3.8% |
| Share count change | −0.1% | −0.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 64.0% | — |
| Operating margin | — | — |
| Net margin | 24.4% | 36.2% |
| FCF margin | 24.5% | — |
| Return on capital | 6.3% | 7.6% |
| Return on equity | 8.5% | 10.1% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $3.9B | $8.2B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.4x | 3.3x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $732M | $1.3B |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 33.8x | 27.2x |
| Piotroski F-score | — | — |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.