FTI Consulting vs TransUnion
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put FTI Consulting and TransUnion side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- TransUnion is the larger business, with $4.6B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.8B for FTI Consulting.
- TransUnion grew revenue faster (9.4%, against 2.4%).
- TransUnion kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (18.7% operating margin, against 10.3%).
- TransUnion turned more of its sales into free cash flow (14.5% FCF margin, against 2.5%).
- FTI Consulting earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (16.6%, against 7.1%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of TransUnion’s earnings: a P/E of 22.1x against 19.4x for FTI Consulting.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
FTI Consulting
FCN
4/10
Return on capitalReturn on equityNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
TransUnion
TRU
6/10
Revenue growth5-year growthOperating marginNet marginFCF marginPiotroski F-score
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | FCN FY25 | TRU FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $4.7B | $15.5B |
| Revenue | $3.8B | $4.6B |
| Free cash flow | $93.6M | $662M |
| Net income | $271M | $455M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 2.4% | 9.4% |
| 5-year growth | 9.0% | 12.6% |
| Share count change | −8.3% | −0.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.1% | — |
| Operating margin | 10.3% | 18.7% |
| Net margin | 7.2% | 10.0% |
| FCF margin | 2.5% | 14.5% |
| Return on capital | 16.6% | 7.1% |
| Return on equity | 13.6% | 10.5% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $99.9M | $4.2B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.2x | 3.0x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $859M | $393M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 19.4x | 22.1x |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

