General Dynamics vs Northrop Grumman
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put General Dynamics and Northrop Grumman side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- General Dynamics is the larger business, with $52.6B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $42.0B for Northrop Grumman.
- General Dynamics grew revenue faster (10.1%, against 2.2%).
- Northrop Grumman kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (10.8% operating margin, against 10.2%).
- General Dynamics earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (14.4%, against 13.5%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
General Dynamics
GD
5/10
Revenue growth5-year growthReturn on capitalPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDA
Northrop Grumman
NOC
5/10
Operating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on equityShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | GD FY25 | NOC FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $97.9B | $80.5B |
| Revenue | $52.6B | $42.0B |
| Free cash flow | $4.0B | $3.3B |
| Net income | $4.2B | $4.2B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 10.1% | 2.2% |
| 5-year growth | 6.7% | 2.7% |
| Share count change | −1.8% | −2.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Operating margin | 10.2% | 10.8% |
| Net margin | 8.0% | 10.0% |
| FCF margin | 7.5% | 7.9% |
| Return on capital | 14.4% | 13.5% |
| Return on equity | 17.7% | 26.2% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $6.1B | $11.3B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.0x | 1.9x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $2.2B | $2.9B |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | 17.9x |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 6 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

