Ralph Lauren vs Williams-Sonoma
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Ralph Lauren and Williams-Sonoma side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Ralph Lauren is the larger business, with $8.1B of revenue in fiscal 2026 against $7.8B for Williams-Sonoma.
- Ralph Lauren grew revenue faster (14.6%, against 1.2%).
- Williams-Sonoma kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (18.1% operating margin, against 14.5%).
- Williams-Sonoma turned more of its sales into free cash flow (13.5% FCF margin, against 9.2%).
- Williams-Sonoma earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (106.5%, against 45.4%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Williams-Sonoma’s earnings: a P/E of 25.6x against 24.4x for Ralph Lauren.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Ralph Lauren
RL
4/11
Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginPiotroski F-score
Williams-Sonoma
WSM
7/11
Operating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | RL FY26 | WSM FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $23.7B | $29.7B |
| Revenue | $8.1B | $7.8B |
| Free cash flow | $746M | $1.1B |
| Net income | $941M | $1.1B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 14.6% | 1.2% |
| 5-year growth | 13.0% | 2.9% |
| Share count change | −2.7% | −3.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.9% | 46.2% |
| Operating margin | 14.5% | 18.1% |
| Net margin | 11.6% | 13.9% |
| FCF margin | 9.2% | 13.5% |
| Return on capital | 45.4% | 106.5% |
| Return on equity | 34.7% | 51.5% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | −$593M | −$1.0B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.4x | −0.6x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $840M | $1.2B |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 24.4x | 25.6x |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

