Northern Oil and Gas vs Range Resources
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Northern Oil and Gas and Range Resources side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Range Resources is the larger business, with $3.1B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $2.5B for Northern Oil and Gas.
- Range Resources grew revenue faster (28.9%, against 11.2%).
- Northern Oil and Gas turned more of its sales into free cash flow (60.8% FCF margin, against 18.9%).
- Range Resources earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (13.7%, against 3.3%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 8 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Northern Oil and Gas
NOG
3/8
5-year growthFCF marginShare count change
Range Resources
RRC
5/8
Revenue growthNet marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-score
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | NOG FY25 | RRC FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $3.1B | $12.7B |
| Revenue | $2.5B | $3.1B |
| Free cash flow | $1.5B | $590M |
| Net income | $38.8M | $658M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 11.2% | 28.9% |
| 5-year growth | 35.0% | 9.6% |
| Share count change | −1.9% | −1.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 80.9% | — |
| Operating margin | 9.9% | — |
| Net margin | 1.6% | 21.1% |
| FCF margin | 60.8% | 18.9% |
| Return on capital | 3.3% | 13.7% |
| Return on equity | 1.7% | 15.9% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $2.4B | $1.2B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | — | 0.9x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $230M | $85.7M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | 14.8x |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.